Bakhiet Mohammedelnazier, Su Maogen, Cao Shiquan, Min Qi, Sun Duixiong, He Siqi, Wu Lei, Dong Chenzhong. Analysis of extreme ultraviolet spectra of laser-produced Cd plasmas. Chinese Physics B, 2020, 29(7): 075203
Permissions
Analysis of extreme ultraviolet spectra of laser-produced Cd plasmas
Bakhiet Mohammedelnazier1, 3, Su Maogen1, 2, †, Cao Shiquan1, Min Qi1, Sun Duixiong1, He Siqi1, Wu Lei1, Dong Chenzhong1, 2, ‡
Key Laboratory of Atomic and Molecular Physics & Functional Material of Gansu Province, College of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
Joint Laboratory of Atomic and Molecular Physics, Northwest Normal University and Institute of Modern Physics of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730070, China
Department of Physics, Faculty of Education, University of the Holy Quran and Islamic Sciences, P. O. Box 1459, Khartoum 14412, Sudan
Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFA0402300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11874051, 11904293, and 61965015), and the Special Fund Project for Guiding Scientific and Technological Innovation of Gansu Province, China (Grant No. 2019zx-10).
Abstract
In order to provide detailed information about Cd structure and gain more insight regarding ionization degrees and types of transition, as well as the understanding of the temporal evolution behavior of laser produced Cd plasmas, extreme ultraviolet spectra of laser-produced cadmium (Cd) plasmas have been measured in the 8.4–12 nm region using spatio-temporally resolved laser-produced plasma spectroscopy technique. Spectral features were analyzed by the Hartree–Fock (HF) method with relativistic correlations (HFR) using the Cowan code. The results showed that the 4p–5s resonance transition arrays from Cd9+ to Cd13+ merged to form intense lines in this spectral region. A number of new spectral features from Cd9+ and Cd10+ ions are reported in this study. Based on the assumption of a normalized Boltzmann distribution among the excited states associated with a steady-state collisional–radiative model, the plasma parameters were obtained by comparing the experimental and simulated spectra. As a result, we succeeded in reproducing the synthetic spectra for different time delays, which yielded good agreement with the experiments. The temporal evolution behaviors of electron temperature and electron density of plasma were also analyzed.
An accurate understanding of the evolution of laser-produced plasmas (LPPs) spectral structures would be very helpful to determine the radiation properties and hydrodynamic evolution of plasmas.[1,2] There are direct applications in many areas of important research, such as nuclear fusion,[3,4] astrophysics,[5] laboratory plasmas as ion sources,[6,7] and short wavelength light sources[8] for extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography.[9–11] Spectroscopic data concerning highly ionized fifth period atoms are important for work in tokamaks and some appear as impurities, such as zirconium and molybdenum.[12] In the last decades, several theoretical and experimental studies on the 4p–5s transition of various elements have been widely studied through their isoelectronic sequences.[13–17] In theoretical studies, the Hartree–Fock with configuration interaction (HFCI) method developed by Cowan[18] and some other computer programs are commonly performed.
Ryabtsev and Kononov[19] systematically observed the spectra of Rh7+, Pd8+, Ag9+, and Cd10+ in 14–33 nm and about 100 lines in each spectrum from 4p64d2–(4d5p + 4d4f + 4p54d3) transitions were reported. Costello and O’Sullivan[20] observed and analysed the spectra from highly ionized Cd LPPs in the 8–11 nm range emitted by 4p–5s transitions from Cd11+ to Cd13+; the spectra were produced by focusing a ruby laser (1.5 J, 25 ns) pulse onto pure Cd and Cd(NO3)2 targets. Their analysis was based on Hartree–Fock and Dirac–Fock with Froese–Fischer and Grant codes.[21,22] The analysis allowed the identification of a number of lines from 4p–5s transitions. However, a full description of the Cd spectrum in the 8–11.8 nm region remains unanalyzed to date.
This study analyzed the EUV spectra of Cd ions from LPPs. The overall objective was to provide detailed information about Cd structure and gain more insight regarding ionization degrees and types of transitions, as well as analyze the temporal evolution behavior. The 8.4–12 nm spectra produced from Cd ions are measured by using spatio-temporally resolved laser-produced plasma spectroscopy. Detailed atomic structure calculations were performed by the Hartree–Fok (HF) method with relativistic correlations (HFR) using the Cowan code. A number of new spectral features were identified from the experimental and calculated results. The collisional–radiative (CR) model[23] was able to deduce the charge distribution, plasma parameters, and ion fractions for different ion stages of Cd LPPs.
2. Experiment
The experimental device is shown in Fig. 1. A detailed description of the experimental procedures has been previously reported.[24] Briefly, a tightly focused 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser with a 10 ns pulse width was used to produce plasmas from a planar metallic Cd target. The EUV radiation was coupled to a 10 μm-entrance slit of a focal-length 1.0 m-grazing-incidence spectrometer, equipped with 600 grooves/mm grating. Spectra were acquired with a 40 mm diameter microchannel plate detector coupled, via a coherent fiber optic bundle, to a 1024× 255 pixel charge-coupled device (CCD). The microchannel gate width was 60 ns and the entrance slit width was 10 μm. The peak of the laser pulse on the target surface was defined as time zero for plasma production, as monitored by an oscilloscope.
The target holder was positioned on a three-dimensional translation stage (0.1 mm resolution) to provide a fresh surface for each laser shot and avoid forming deep craters. A lens positioned on a linear translation stage with the same resolution could be moved along the laser beam direction for convenient adjustment of laser focusing. Spectra were recorded 0.5 mm from the target surface. Known lines from the LPPs spectra of highly charged Al and Si ions were used to calibrate the spectrometer wavelength. Figure 2 shows the measured emission spectra of the laser-produced Cd plasmas after different time delays, measured at a laser power density of 2× 1011 W/cm2. Spectral intensity along the wavelength range varied with increasing time delay. Several intense narrow peaks were observed at 8.95 nm, 9.42 nm, 10.25, 10.66 nm, and 11.49 nm with widths of ∼0.05 nm, 0.03 nm, 0.02 nm, 0.03 nm, and 0.02 nm, respectively.
Fig. 2. Time evolution of extreme ultraviolet spectra of Cd produced by a laser power density of 2 × 1011 W/cm2 at 0.5 mm from the target surface.
3. Atomic structure calculations and analysis
In earlier studies,[20] only 36 lines in the 8.0–11 nm range have been reported and identified as the 4p–5s resonance transitions of Cd11+, Cd12+, and Cd13+; other lines between 11–12 nm are unknown. To determine new features and confirm prior identifications, calculations of the 4p–5s transitions from Cd9+ to Cd13+ were carried out by HFR using Cowan’s codes.[18]
In these calculations, the electrostatic Slater–Condon Fk, Gk, and Rk integrals were reduced to 95%, the spin–orbit parameter ζ was retained, and the configuration interaction effects were considered. The calculations predicted that 4p–4d and 4d–4f configurations would enhance the 4p–5s transitions in Cd9+ to Cd11+. The study also showed that important interactions affecting the 4s24pk-15s configurations in Cd12+ and Cd13+ ions were 4s24pk – 1nd, 4s14pknf, 4s24pk – 1ms, and 4s4pkε p, in view of the important effects on the wavelengths and spectral line intensities. Note that n = 4–7, m = 6–7, and ε = 5–7 and k took the values of 6 (Cd12+) and 5 (Cd13+). To compare the spectra obtained from the experiment with theoretical output, the transition lines were calculated by convolving each line with a 0.05 eV full width at half maximum (FWHM) Gaussian profile. It should be noted that the same parameters were assumed for each ion. The most intense peak in the 10.63–10.69 nm region was from a mixture of the Cd9+ and Cd10+ stages.
To evaluate the accuracy of the present calculations, a comparison between the results obtained in Ref. [20] and the present work is summarized in Tables 1–3. The similarity between a measured spectrum and calculated wavelengths helped the identification of the spectral lines. As can be seen in Tables 1 and 2, our calculations are consistent with calculations in Ref. [20]. The difference in the wavelengths had an error of approximately ⩽ 0.04 nm in most cases. Additionally, our calculation predicted new lines for Cd11+, specifically,2D5/2–(3P) 2P3/2, 2D3/2–(1D) 2D3/2, 2D5/2–(3D) 2D3/2, and 2D5/2–(1P) 2P3/2 transitions at 10.1 nm, 10.19 nm, 9.42 nm, and 8.51 nm, respectively. These lines showed a relatively high transition probability to the ground level, but had not been reported previously. Meanwhile, 20 levels were previously identified for Cd11+. All levels of 4p–5s configurations in Cd11+ to Cd13+ reported in Ref. [20] were confirmed and some additional levels were established. The wavelengths were revised in this analysis and the values of the levels were also changed slightly. Furthermore, the ground configuration of Cd11+ was 4p64d 2D5/2,3/2 and the investigated 4p54d5s configuration had 23 levels. The most excited states found were 4p64d–4p5nd (n = 4–6), 4p64d–4p54dε s (ε = 5–7), and 4p64d–4p6mf (m = 4–6). Additionally, Cd12+ had six p-electrons forming a completely filled shell. Its excited state was obtained by excitation of one of the 4p electrons into 4p5ns and 4p5md. The 4p–5s excitation gave only two levels. The ground state of Cd13+ was 4s24p5 2P3/2,1/2 with 2P3/2 lying deepest. The even excited states corresponded to 4p4ns and 4p4nd configurations. Eight levels were obtained in the 4p–5s transition.
Table 1.
Table 1.
Table 1.
Comparison of the calculated wavelengths for resonance lines of the 4p64d–4p54d5s transition in Cd11+ ion.
.
Transition
Previous work(*)
This work
|Δλ|
gA(b)/1010 s−1
λExp
λExp.
λCal.
2D3/2–(1F) 2F5/2
9.30
9.29
9.27
9.28
0.01
0.701
2D5/2–(1F) 2F5/2
9.39
9.38
9.37
9.36
0.02
20.224
2D5/2–(1F) 2F7/2
9.43
9.41
9.42
9.40
0.01
30.810
2D3/2–(1D) 2D5/2
9.51
9.49
9.42
9.47
0.02
30.205
2D5/2–(1D) 2D5/2
9.59
9.58
9.54
9.56
0.02
0.094
2D3/2–(3D) 2D5/2
9.77
9.73
9.79
9.71
0.02
0.228
2D5/2–(3D) 2D5/2
9.86
9.82
9.79
9.80
0.02
20.800
2D5/2–(3D) 4D7/2
9.91
9.88
9.86
9.85
0.03
9.058
2D3/2–(3F) 4F3/2
9.94
9.96
9.92
9.93
0.03
5.739
2D3/2–(3F) 2F5/2
9.95
9.92
9.86
9.89
0.03
30.098
2D3/2–(3p)2P3/2
10.01
10.04
10.02
10.00
0.04
10.197
2D5/2–(3F) 4F3/2
10.04
10.05
10.02
10.02
0.03
7.472
2D5/2–(3F) 2F5/2
10.05
10.02
9.98
9.98
0.04
5.324
2D5/2–(3F) 2F7/2
10.09
10.08
10.03
10.04
0.04
5.621
2D3/2–(3P) 4P5/2
10.13
10.13
10.09
10.09
0.04
0.167
2D5/2–(3F) 4F5/2
10.14
10.14
10.11
10.10
0.04
0.945
2D3/2–(3p)2P1/2
10.15
10.19
10.13
10.15
0.04
10.677
2D5/2–(3F) 4F7/2
10.18
10.19
10.13
10.14
0.05
4.120
2D5/2–(3P) 4P5/2
10.23
10.23
10.18
10.19
0.04
2.346
Data from Ref. [20]. λExp. and λCal. denote experimental and calculated wavelengths and .
Present calculations.
Table 1.
Comparison of the calculated wavelengths for resonance lines of the 4p64d–4p54d5s transition in Cd11+ ion.
.
Table 2.
Table 2.
Table 2.
Comparison of the calculated wavelengths for resonance lines of the 4p6–4p55s and 4p5–4p45s transitions in Cd12+ and Cd13+ ions.
.
Ions
Transition
Previous work(*)
This work
|4λ|
gA(b)/1010 s−1
λExp.
λExp.
λCal.
Cd12+
8.97
8.95
8.95
8.95
0.00
20.698
9.45
9.44
9.42
9.42
0.02
20.320
Cd13+
9.00
9.00
8.95
9.00
0.00
20.287
9.05
9.04
9.05
9.03
0.01
8.082
9.28
9.26
9.24
9.25
0.01
0.0925
2P3/2-4P3/2
8.95
8.96
8.95
8.95
0.01
20.433
Data from Ref. [20]. λExp and λCal denote experimental and calculated wavelengths and .
Present calculations.
Table 2.
Comparison of the calculated wavelengths for resonance lines of the 4p6–4p55s and 4p5–4p45s transitions in Cd12+ and Cd13+ ions.
.
Table 3.
Table 3.
Table 3.
Comparison of the calculated energy levels of 4p64d, 4s24p6, 4s24p5, 4p54d5s, 4s24p55s, and 4s24p45s arrays of Cd11+, Cd12+, and Cd13+ ions. The levels are designated in LS coupling scheme.
Comparison of the calculated energy levels of 4p64d, 4s24p6, 4s24p5, 4p54d5s, 4s24p55s, and 4s24p45s arrays of Cd11+, Cd12+, and Cd13+ ions. The levels are designated in LS coupling scheme.
.
Our results showed that the highest emission lines from gf-values belong to Cd10+ ions. Moreover, calculations of the emission line wavelengths for highly ionized Cd9+ to Cd10+ were in close agreement (the error was 0.01 nm or less) with experimental values. According to the J selection rules, the 4p54d35s and 4p54d25s excited configurations of Cd9+ and Cd10+ permitted 1860 lines in Cd9+, extending from 8.78 nm to 12.60 nm; 371 transition lines to the ground level of Cd10+ were in the 8.62–11.47 nm region, but many were weak. Only transition lines with gf-values greater than 0.1 and agreement with the measured spectrum are listed in Tables 4 and 5.
Table 4.
Table 4.
Table 4.
Measured and calculated wavelengths, weighted oscillator strengths (gf), and weighted transition probabilities (gA) for the strongest lines from the 4p64d3–4p54d35s transition in Cd9+ ion.
.
Transition
Wavelength/nm
gf(a)
gA/1010 s−1
4p64d3 4P5/2
4p54d35s(4p)4D7/2
11.65
11.64
0.183
8.989
4p64d3 2D3/2
4p54d35s(2P)2P3/2
11.49
11.49
0.143
7.219
4p64d3 2P3/2
4p54d35s(4F)4G5/2
11.35
11.35
0.119
6.172
4p64d3 2D3/2
4p54d35s(2P)4D5/2
11.30
11.29
0.185
9.704
4p64d3 2H9/2
4p54d35s(2H)4I9/2
11.24
11.23
0.122
6.461
4p64d3 4F7/2
4p54d35s(4F)4G9/2
11.18
11.18
0.191
10.02
4p64d3 4F3/2
4p54d35s(4F)6G5/2
10.95
10.94
0.126
6.999
4p64d3 2G7/2
4p54d35s(2G)2H9/2
10.66
10.66
0.577
30.39
4p64d3 2D3/2
4p54d35s(2D)2D3/2
10.52
10.51
0.242
10.46
4p64d3 2G9/2
4p54d35s(2G)2H11/2
10.45
10.46
0.349
20.13
4p64d3 2H11/2
4p54d35s(2H)2H9/2
10.21
10.20
0.589
30.77
4p64d3 2G9/2
4p54d35s(2H)2H9/2
10.10
10.11
0.208
10.36
4p64d3 4F9/2
4p54d35s(2H)4H11/2
9.94
9.94
0.497
10.61
4p64d3 2F5/2
4p54d35s(4F)4F3/2
9.86
9.88
0.154
10.05
4p64d3 2G7/2
4p54d35s(4P)4P5/2
9.54
9.55
0.128
9.322
4p64d3 4F3/2
4p54d35s(4F)4F3/2
9.50
9.50
0.128
9.469
4p64d3 4F7/2
4p54d35s(4F)4F7/2
9.42
9.41
0.188
10.42
4p64d3 2H11/2
4p54d35s(2H)2G9/2
9.27
9.27
0.215
10.67
4p64d3 4P5/2
4p54d35s(4P)4S3/2
9.11
9.11
0.108
8.712
Only transitions with gf > 0.1 are listed.
Table 4.
Measured and calculated wavelengths, weighted oscillator strengths (gf), and weighted transition probabilities (gA) for the strongest lines from the 4p64d3–4p54d35s transition in Cd9+ ion.
.
Table 5.
Table 5.
Table 5.
Measured and calculated wavelengths, weighted oscillator strength (gf), and weighted transition probabilities (gA) for the strongest lines from the 4p64d2–4p54d25s transition in Cd10+ ion.
.
Transition
Wavelength/nm
gf(a)
gA/1010 s−1
Lower level
Upper level
λExp.
λCal.
4P64d2 3F3
4P54d25s(3F)3D3
10.73
10.73
0.141
8.158
4P64d2 1D1
4P54d25s(1D1)1D1
10.66
10.66
0.105
6.182
4P64d2 3F3
4P54d25s(1D)3D2
10.60
10.60
0.145
8.615
4P64d2 1D2
4P54d25s(1D)3F3
10.51
10.51
0.438
20.640
4P64d2 3F2
4P54d25s(3F)5G2
10.21
10.20
0.179
10.150
4P64d2 3P
4P54d25s(3P)5D1
10.10
10.10
0.171
10.120
4P64d2 3F4
4P54d25s(3F)3D3
10.03
10.03
0.376
20.490
4P64d2 1S
4P54d25s(1S)3P1
9.96
9.96
0.217
10.460
4P64d2 1G4
4P54d25s(1G)3G5
9.93
9.93
0.543
30.670
4P64d2 3P2
4P54d25s(3P)3S1
9.86
9.87
0.210
10.440
4P64d2 1G4
4P54d25s(3F)3F3
9.54
9.55
0.144
10.050
4P64d2 3F2
4P54d25s(3F)3F2
9.27
9.27
0.170
10.320
4P64d2 3F4
4P54d25s(1G)3F4
9.15
9.15
0.299
20.380
4P64d2 3P1
4P54d25s(3P)3P2
8.94
8.94
0.108
9.027
Costello and O’Sullivan[20] observed spectra at 8–11 nm to study the 4p–5s resonance transition in Cd11+, Cd12+, and Cd13+. In our new observation, the EUV spectrum was measured between 8.4–12 nm. Therefore, to predict theoretically longer wavelengths, we considered lower ionizations stages of Cd9+ and Cd10+. The discrete line emissions of the 4p–5s resonance transition from the 4pk4dn (k = 4, 5 and n = 0–3) ground state presented in stages from Cd9+ to Cd13+, and provided emission peaks characteristic for the structure.
To our knowledge, no measurements of level designations, wavelengths, oscillator strengths, and transition probabilities for 4p–5s of Cd9+ and Cd10+ were previously available, so our calculated results (Tables 4 and 5) are important for future assessment and comparisons.
Only transitions with gf > 0.1 are listed.
Table 5.
Measured and calculated wavelengths, weighted oscillator strength (gf), and weighted transition probabilities (gA) for the strongest lines from the 4p64d2–4p54d25s transition in Cd10+ ion.
.
Moreover, the ground levels of Cd9+ and Cd10+ possessed an open 4d, and the exciting configurations contained open ns, np, εf, and εd (n = 5–7, ε = 4–6) subshells; hence, there exist many hyperfine degenerate energy levels when they couple with the electrons of other shells. The ground configurations (4p64d3, 4p64d2) of Cd9+ and Cd10+ had 19 and 9 levels, respectively, while the 4p54d35s and 4p54d25s configurations had 212 (Cd9+) and 90 (Cd10+) levels. The predicted energy levels resulting from the 4p–5s resonance transitions of Cd9+ and Cd10+ are listed in Tables 6 and 7. In these tables, the energy levels of the ground states (4p64d3, 4p64d2) and excited states (4p54d35s, 4p54d25s) of Cd9+ and Cd10+ were established. Figure 3 shows the calculated energy levels of the 4pk4dn (k = 5, 6 and n = 0–3) configurations and the spread of 4p54dn5s configurations in Cd9+ through Cd13+ below 160 eV.
Fig. 3. Schematic overview of the calculated energy levels of the 4pk4dn (k = 5, 6 and n = 0–3) configurations in Cd9+ through Cd13+. The vertical bars at the top show the spread of 4p54dn5s configurations below 160 eV.
Table 6.
Table 6.
Table 6.
The predicted energy levels of 4p64d3 and 4p54d35s arrays of Cd9+ ion. The levels are designated in LS coupling scheme.
.
Configuration
Designation
J
Energy/cm−1
4p64d3
4F
3/2
0
4F
7/2
7590
4F
9/2
11517
4P
3/2
21397
2G
9/2
27393
4P
5/2
27686
2G
9/2
36278
2H
11/2
36580
2H
9/2
37763
2P
3/2
43577
2F
7/2
53242
2F
5/2
53883
2D
5/2
81282
2D
3/2
82071
4p54d35s
(4P)4D
7/2
853398
(4F)4G
9/2
868566
(2P)2P
3/2
869976
(4F)6G
5/2
880546
(2P)4D
5/2
885320
(4F)4G
5/2
891866
(2H)4I
9/2
894903
(2G)2H
9/2
931666
(2G)2H
11/2
950683
(2H)2H
9/2
983391
(2D)2D
3/2
1000195
(2H)4H
11/2
1009069
(4F)4F
3/2
1019436
(4F)4F
3/2
1032026
(4F)4F
7/2
1037463
(4P)4P
5/2
1039841
(2H)2G
9/2
1082706
Table 6.
The predicted energy levels of 4p64d3 and 4p54d35s arrays of Cd9+ ion. The levels are designated in LS coupling scheme.
.
Table 7.
Table 7.
Table 7.
The predicted energy levels of 4p64d2 and 4p54d25s arrays of Cd10+ ion. The levels are designated in LS coupling scheme.
.
Configuration
Designation
J
Energy/cm−1
4p64d2
3F
2
0
3F
3
6442
3F
4
12857
3P
0
22390
1D
2
22633
3P
1
25565
3P
2
32883
1G
4
34752
1S
75086
4p54d25s
(3F)3D
3
917770
(1D)3D
2
928910
(1D1)1D
1
940360
(1D)3F
3
953505
(3F)5G
2
959456
(3F)3D
3
989288
(3P)5D
1
991554
(1G)3G
5
1020888
(1S)3P
1
1058752
(3P)3S
1
1025485
(3F)3F
2
1058534
(3F)3F
3
1061255
(1G)3F
4
1085129
(3P)3P
2
1123405
Table 7.
The predicted energy levels of 4p64d2 and 4p54d25s arrays of Cd10+ ion. The levels are designated in LS coupling scheme.
.
4. Comparison between theoretical and experimental spectra
The variation in wavelengths as a function of charge state is the most important feature to compare with experimental data. The 4p–5s resonance transition arrays of mixtures of Cd9+ to Cd13+ result in emission peaks and are responsible for the structures. This characteristic feature was readily observed and identified in the measured spectra. The dominant contributions were from Cd9+ and Cd10+.
To complete our simulations, the ion fractions of different stages as a function of electron density and electron temperature were calculated based on a steady-state CR model.[23] To the best of our knowledge, calculations of highly ionized Cd based on a CR model have not been studied previously. Figures 4(a) and 4(b) show the ion fractions of Cd9+ to Cd13+ as a function of electron temperature for an electron density Ne = 5× 1020 cm–3 (Fig. 4(a)), and as a function of electron density for an electron temperature Te = 35 eV (Fig. 4(b)). From these results, it is clear that Te within 22–35 eV and Ne in the 1× 1019 cm–3 to 5× 1021 cm–3 range can be expected to produce Cd9+ to Cd13+ ions. For a number of lines (N) within 8.4–12 nm, an accurate identification would not be possible because only some data were sorted for comparison. The total synthetic emission profile was calculated by Itot = Σigfi,kFiPi,kΓi,k, where gfi,k is the oscillator strength, Fi is the ion fraction, Pi,k = exp (–ΔE/kT) is the Boltzmann factor, and Γi,k is the associated Lorentzian profile function. For simplicity, we used the emission spectrum measured after 40 ns time delay as an example (Fig. 4). In Fig. 4, an experimental spectrum is compared with the simulation results obtained for an electron temperature of 34 eV and an electron density of 7× 1020 cm–3.
Fig. 4. Ion fractions for different ion stages as a function of (a) electron temperature and (b) electron density.
There was good agreement when the dominant fractional contribution rose with values of 6% (Cd9+), 23% (Cd10+), 40% (Cd11+), 28% (Cd12+), and 1% (Cd13+) (see column chart insert in Fig. 5(a)). Figure 5(b) also presents the line profiles from Cd9+ to Cd13+ by assuming a normalized Boltzmann distribution among the excited states for the same conditions mentioned above. The same procedure was used to simulate the spectra after other time delays (Fig. 6). The comparison between the experimental and the simulated spectra yielded the relationships between the experimental conditions and plasma parameters. Figure 7 depicts the temporal evolution of the ion fractions of Cd9+ to Cd13+ at time delays ranging from 20 ns to 70 ns to gain a deeper understanding of the temporal characteristics of the ionized stages of highly charged ions from the Cd LPP spectra. The initial fraction at 20 ns was dominated by Cd11+ that gradually increased with increasing time delay (Fig. 7). However, with a time delay of 20 ns, the ion fractions of Cd12+ and Cd10+ were very close. For Cd12+, the fractions increased until 30 ns and then decreased gradually, whereas Cd10+ showed the opposite pattern. It was noted that with an increasing time delay, Cd11+ and Cd10+ ions become more important after 30 ns. Moreover, the fractions of Cd9+ and Cd13+ ions were approximately constant along this sequence of time delays and had lower contributions.
Fig. 5. Comparisons between the experiment (black line) recorded after 40 ns time delay and simulated spectra (red line). The column chart insert in (a) displays the ion fractions of Cd9+, Cd10+, Cd11+, Cd12+, and Cd13+.
Fig. 7. Temporal behavior of the Cd9+ to Cd13+ ion fractions.
Figures 8 and 9 show the evolution of electron temperature and electron density with time delays from 20 ns to 70 ns, respectively. Their fitting relations are given in their respective graphs. The Te is the electron temperature; Ne is the electron density; and t is the delay time. It was clear that the electron temperature displayed an exponential decay from 36 eV to 30 eV with increasing time delay. The electron density exhibited a sharp maximum at 20 ns and then a sharp decay to 30 ns with a more gradual decay thereafter. The decay of the electron temperature and electron density explains the free expansion behavior of LPPs in vacuum near the target surface.
The EUV emission spectra of Cd9+ to Cd13+ ions from laser-produced plasma were measured in the 8.4–12 nm region using a temporally and spatially resolved laser-produced plasma technique. The spectra dominated by a great number of lines from 4p–5s were analyzed using HFCI codes. A number of new features were identified for the first time and were tentatively assigned. Based on a steady-state CR model, plasma parameters were obtained for different ion stages by comparing experimental and simulated spectra. The simulated results for different time delays were in good agreement with the experimental spectra. In addition, the temporal evolution of electron temperature and electron density for Cd LPPs, and exponential decay of electron temperature and electron density were also described in this study. The results are helpful for astrophysics and plasma laboratory.